Close Menu
Beverly Hills Examiner

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    40 Unique Gifts Your Wife Will Surely Swoon Over

    February 4, 2026

    PepsiCo will cut the cost of snacks like Doritos by ‘up to 15%’

    February 4, 2026

    California Dems lash out at ICE during gubernatorial debate

    February 4, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Beverly Hills Examiner
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Lifestyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
    Beverly Hills Examiner
    Home»Television»Boss on Why Burzek’s Vows Weren’t Shown, Voight Arranging Reid’s Death, More (Exclusive)
    Television

    Boss on Why Burzek’s Vows Weren’t Shown, Voight Arranging Reid’s Death, More (Exclusive)

    By AdminMay 22, 2025
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit Telegram
    Boss on Why Burzek’s Vows Weren’t Shown, Voight Arranging Reid’s Death, More (Exclusive)


    [Warning: The below contains MAJOR spoilers for the Chicago P.D. Season 12 finale “Vows.”]

    Considering the episode title, it is surprising that in the Chicago P.D. finale, we don’t see Burgess (Marina Squerciati) and Ruzek (Patrick John Flueger) exchange theirs.

    Don’t worry, though, because they are married when Season 13 begins. What’s less certain? The status of Intelligence. After all, Reid (Shawn Hatosy) did open up investigations into their actions, and yes, he was dirty. That is now clear, thanks to Voight’s (Jason Beghe) actions, including moving the pieces into place for the son of the drug dealer Reid had killed to fatally shoot the deputy chief, but any fallout remains up in the air.

    Below, executive producer Gwen Sigan breaks down the finale, explains why we didn’t see more of the Burzek wedding, and teases what’s to come.

    Will we see the parts of Burgess and Ruzek’s wedding we didn’t?

    Gwen Sigan: Probably not, no. I mean there’s a version of this, yeah, sure, where we could jump back into the wedding, but I doubt it.

    Marina Squerciati as Officer Kim Burgess, Patrick John Flueger as Officer Adam Ruzek — 'Chicago P.D.' Season 12 Finale

    Lori Allen / NBC

    With the episode titled “Vows,” why not show the vows and were any written?

    We thought a lot about writing the vows for sure. I think as we were going through the process of sort of putting all these storylines together, you have this very high-stake situation for Voight, for the full team. In so many ways, this is really a Voight episode, and so to also want to marry it with this wedding was tricky, and we wanted the right tone. We wanted to juxtapose the best we could this really emotional ending in Chapman [Sara Bues] and Voight and this cost, and then also have this happiness and the promise of more to come and the reason why Voight took the actions he took, to see all of that happiness and at the same time, you’re seeing this heartbreak. So the vows themselves are so sweet that it just felt like it wasn’t the right juxtaposition. It felt like it was a little too jarring. So that’s kind of why we ended up going in this direction that we chose to really lean more into this conversation between Chapman and Voight.

    So those vows, could we possibly see them at some point in some capacity?

    Yeah, I mean, who knows. They’re definitely not shot. We definitely didn’t shoot anything. So yeah, they’re not just hanging out for us to put out there, but who knows? You never know, I suppose, where we could take the next season.

    Was there any plan to bring back any past characters for the wedding and that didn’t work out for any reason, or did you not go that route because of everything you just talked about?

    Yeah, I mean, I think there was a moment where we were like, “Oh my gosh, what if we could bring back everybody and have Upton [Tracy Spiridakos] and Halstead [Jesse Lee Soffer] show up?” It ends up just becoming about production at the end of the day. We would’ve loved that, but to have these big actors come back for what amounts to really one scene doesn’t make sense. But we definitely thought about it. I think there’s a version of that wedding where everybody in one Chicago would’ve been there across all three shows. It would’ve been cool.

    What are you looking at doing next season with Burgess and Ruzek now that they’re finally married?

    We’re not in the room yet, so I think everything’s an option at this moment, but I think it’ll be really fun to write a married couple. We haven’t had a married couple on the show, really, since Halstead and Upton were married, but their marriage was very fraught. So this will feel a little bit different. And yeah, I think it’ll be a challenge, and I think it will be just an interesting dynamic to see play out at home, but also at work and sort of what they could be pushed into because they have that stability at home, kind of taking risks at work could be really fun and different.

    Shawn Hatosy as Deputy Chief Reid, Jason Beghe as Sgt. Hank Voight — 'Chicago P.D.' Season 12 Finale

    Lori Allen / NBC

    Why kill off Reid and in the way that you did with Voight arranging it?

    I think we sort of always knew that when Shawn signed on that it’d be a one-year thing, and what we really envisioned that character as was this funhouse mirror to Voight because that’s really what we wanted him to be. And the idea was he was going to be testing Voight at every single turn and sort of testing, has Voight changed? Has he evolved? Who is he now? And to kind of really test that, we needed to take it sort of as dark as we could make it and make the stakes as high as we could, which you see in the penultimate. This is the first time that we’re basically kicked out of our offices and are told that it’s all going to be taken apart and basically stripped for pieces. So it brought Voight to that place, and it felt like we wanted to get him to his darkest place and see if he would take the bait and obviously his character did.

    We see a photo of Voight and Olinsky when Intelligence’s stuff is packed in the boxes, then there’s the moment when Voight looks at Olinsky’s badge. Would Olinsky have been able to talk Voight out of what he did?

    I think, yeah, I think he could have. I think definitely probably the only person that could have. Maybe Upton. But no, I think only Olinsky probably could have.

    Speaking of, Reid tells Voight, “You’re worse than me,” and Voight tells Chapman, “I don’t get more.” Where is Voight’s headspace when it comes to who he is and slipping back into old habits at the end of the finale?

    I think, in my head, when he decides what he’s going to do before he puts this plan into action — and there’s this nice scene where Chapman tries to stop him and he says, “I have to do it” — I think in that moment, he knows that the cost is going to be her, that the cost is going to be this sense of more, this thing that he’s been talking about since he kind of hallucinated Olinsky last season. I think he knew that cost and did it anyway. So, to me, that sort of final scene and the few scenes at the end of the episode are sort of confirming that for him. I like the idea that with Reid’s statement, it’s something the audience can question. It’s something that there’s a lot of different ways to look at it. Is it true? Is it not true? And I think it’s going to be rattling around in Voight’s subconscious for a while. And I do think it has something to do with why he knows, yeah, he’s got to end this thing with Chapman. He’s got to not drag people into this place with him because it’s not a place where I think he thinks anyone else belongs.

    Voight guessed that with the claims against Reid, the investigation into Intelligence would disappear. Is he right? Will Intelligence be back operating like it was before Reid when next season picks up?

    That’s the question. I don’t know the answer yet, but I love that we have a lot of options. So that’s where we’ll start in the room, I’m sure, is answering that question, but I like that it’s open right now.

    How’s Atwater’s relationship? Because he ignored that call from Val…

    I know! I think he ignored that call because of the headspace he was in, so much going on. But I do think it’s indicative, right? He’s made so much progress, I think, as a person this season. With that relationship, it’s kind of grown him up in a way. I think he’s become better at talking about his own shortfalls, his own flaws, and his feelings. So it’s interesting that his instinct in that moment was to isolate. And so we’ll see where that takes us in the future.

    I know you said the room hasn’t started yet, but is everyone returning in the same capacity next season, like series regulars-wise? Is that the plan?

    I don’t know all the details yet.

    Is there anything else you can tease about next season or what you want to do? Is there anything from that you couldn’t get to this season that you’re holding?

    Yeah, we had a few storylines we couldn’t get to this season that I still think are out there and could be interesting next year. I think Torres [Benjamin Levy Aguilar] is in this really interesting spot where nothing has been buttoned up for him. He’s in this very emotional, vulnerable spot, which would be really interesting to keep writing. I think Voight obviously, who knows what this guy’s going to get up to next year. I mean, he’s definitely in an interesting place and to see how the team is going to react to that because the team has different relationships with him now than years ago. So how is that going to all work out next season? So there’s a lot of, I think, interesting places we could go and we’ll just hopefully make it fresh and different.

    Because of everything that’s happened, is anyone looking at the job differently now from the rest of the team? Because Burgess dealt with having her badge stripped from her…

    I think so. I think a lot of them are. I mean, I definitely think Burgess, like you mentioned. For her, she had a lot to do with all of this, but she was really just trying to have someone’s back. She was just trying to have her teammates back and so to see the consequences of it, I think it will have an effect on how she moves forward. And certainly Torres. I think Torres has learned from his mistakes, has definitely paid the consequences, has seen what it can do, and I think he’s still dealing with that and dealing with the emotional fallout of all of that. So definitely his relationship to the job has changed.

    Chicago P.D., Season 13, Fall 2025, Wednesdays, 10/9c, NBC





    Original Source Link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Reddit Telegram
    Previous ArticleThe Best Memorial Day Sales 2025: Editor-Approved Finds
    Next Article The History of Sound – first-look review

    RELATED POSTS

    Shaboozey Slammed For Tone Deaf Grammy Speech, Jelly Roll

    February 4, 2026

    ‘High Potential’ Boss Breaks Down Morgan’s Panic Attack and Comfort From Karadec Amid New Relationship (Exclusive)

    February 4, 2026

    Despina Mirou — Hollywood’s Multi-Faceted Wildcard

    February 3, 2026

    ‘1000-Lb Sisters’ Amy Slaton Admits Weight Loss ‘Bothers’ Her

    February 3, 2026

    Is ‘The Rookie’ Heading for Nolan and Bailey Divorce? Plus How Aaron Thorsen Returned

    February 3, 2026

    ‘Today’ Savannah Guthrie Dragged For Serena Williams Interview

    February 2, 2026
    latest posts

    40 Unique Gifts Your Wife Will Surely Swoon Over

    All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a…

    PepsiCo will cut the cost of snacks like Doritos by ‘up to 15%’

    February 4, 2026

    California Dems lash out at ICE during gubernatorial debate

    February 4, 2026

    Anthony Davis joins Wizards in trade from Mavericks: report

    February 4, 2026

    A New AI Math Startup Just Cracked 4 Previously Unsolved Problems

    February 4, 2026

    Why Are Some Women Training for Pregnancy Like It’s a Marathon?

    February 4, 2026

    The Spooky Reason Robert Pattinson’s Batcave Is Batman’s Best Live-Action HQ Yet

    February 4, 2026
    Categories
    • Books (1,040)
    • Business (5,946)
    • Film (5,882)
    • Lifestyle (3,984)
    • Music (5,950)
    • Politics (5,951)
    • Science (5,293)
    • Technology (5,880)
    • Television (5,569)
    • Uncategorized (2)
    • US News (5,932)
    popular posts

    Expedock cinches Series A to grow its freight paperwork management platform – TechCrunch

    Since the start of the pandemic, the global supply chain has undergone — and is…

    Anti-violence worker found in Chicago home naked with gun, suspected narcotics and $50K cash: prosecutors

    January 12, 2023

    A Lifelong Quest to Improve Mental Health Among Cancer Patients [Sponsored]

    August 24, 2022

    Stocks scoot higher on low inflation numbers but Boeing sinks after fatal Air India disaster

    June 12, 2025
    Archives
    Browse By Category
    • Books (1,040)
    • Business (5,946)
    • Film (5,882)
    • Lifestyle (3,984)
    • Music (5,950)
    • Politics (5,951)
    • Science (5,293)
    • Technology (5,880)
    • Television (5,569)
    • Uncategorized (2)
    • US News (5,932)
    About Us

    We are a creativity led international team with a digital soul. Our work is a custom built by the storytellers and strategists with a flair for exploiting the latest advancements in media and technology.

    Most of all, we stand behind our ideas and believe in creativity as the most powerful force in business.

    What makes us Different

    We care. We collaborate. We do great work. And we do it with a smile, because we’re pretty damn excited to do what we do. If you would like details on what else we can do visit out Contact page.

    Our Picks

    Why Are Some Women Training for Pregnancy Like It’s a Marathon?

    February 4, 2026

    The Spooky Reason Robert Pattinson’s Batcave Is Batman’s Best Live-Action HQ Yet

    February 4, 2026

    Shaboozey Slammed For Tone Deaf Grammy Speech, Jelly Roll

    February 4, 2026
    © 2026 Beverly Hills Examiner. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT